An eBay member just sent me an email to let me know he owned this Pierce 25-30 years ago.The car waspreviouslyin the Harrah's collection in Reno Nevada for many years and it was always an excellent original car.
In his mind it was a waste of a lot of money to restore a car that was already excellent!
Things like that happens, ou start off doing minor work and before you know it you are doing a frame off restoration.We have restored cars professionally for over 29 years in Arizona and 15 years before that in Europe and several of our own cars have received total restorations even though they really did not need to be restored.
More information about this Pierce Arrow:"Seems from the attached the Pierce was bought new in Denver in 1925, old in Denver to persons unknown in 1952 after the original owner died, nd then sold to Harrah's from Wyoming in 1964 for $1 (another Harrah's document suggests they paid $950).
It was with a well known collector (can't remember his name) in Redding, A in the 1980s and then maybe went through Pat Craig in Stockton, A (owner of nearly every Pierce at some point, t seems). A fellow named Wayne Sheldon of Livermore, A had it in 1995 when I bought it for $12K.I sold it to a Japanese guy who didn't speak English - he had just bought a house in Los Angeles formerly owned by Charlie Chaplin and then Mary Astor, nd was supposedly a movie buff and wanted an old car.I believe it was he who perpetrated the completely unnecessary restoration. I included a large amount of literature, anuals, istory etc. with the car I have a lot of photos of the car when I had it. Good luck with the sale - I'm happy to talk to the new owner. Jim".So it does look like we have the history of this Pierce since new, hat is a huge plus. As far as we know the Japanese owner in Los Angeles paid around $75.000 to have the car restored and the restoration was finished 10 or so years ago and he then sold it to the person in Southern Arizona who recently passed away.